Clarifying content options
I want to make sure I avoid misinformation, so I should ask if the user has sources to refer to. Since the environmental aspect isn't specified, I need to avoid any assumptions. I can offer various options like drafting a balanced article or creating a social media post thread. It might be best to clarify if they need a headline rewrite or if they have a specific context in mind. I should respond in Chinese and keep it concise.Drafting content options
I need to confirm what the user wants, like rewriting a title, writing a press release, or creating an outline or social media copy. I'll consider the style: whether they want neutral reporting, incisive commentary, or rational analysis, and specify the length too. It's important to know if there are reliable sources or key facts. I can suggest offering a quick neutral rewrite sample for immediate value, ensuring I include disclaimers. Let's get the final draft ready!
你想让我怎么处理这个话题？要不要我基于这个线索产出一版内容，还是先改写标题？
可选方案
- 改写标题：保持吸引力但更稳妥的中性表述，或做多条风格化标题备选
- 快讯通稿：300–500字，客观梳理事件与双方说法
- 深度评论：800–1200字，聚焦“球员发声 vs 媒体/管理层”的博弈与背景
- 社媒文案：微博/公众号/头条/B站口播稿，各1–2版
- 提纲与要点卡：列出事实、时间线、争议点、引用位
为避免不实信息，请告知
- 是否有来源链接或你掌握的要点/原话
- 你希望的立场与语气：客观报道 / 犀利评论 / 理性分析
- 目标平台与字数
先给你两条更稳妥的标题改写示例
- 传萨拉赫回应外界质疑：否认失实报道，称与球队高层沟通存在分歧 
- 舆论风波下的萨拉赫：公开反击“被曲解”，球队内部管理引发讨论
需要哪种版本？或者把链接/要点发我，我按你的口径成稿。